Vaccine discovery and development
Vaccines have become key weapons in the fight against infectious disease and as immunotherapies for other conditions including certain cancers and Alzheimer’s disease. Immunoassays in vaccine development play a key role and meeting ever more pressing deadlines means that efficient and flexible platforms are at a premium, especially in times like these, with the COVID-19 pandemic pressing vaccine R&D to the limit. In this two-part series we will be looking at how immunoassays can contribute to vaccine R&D and production.
A paradigm shift in vaccine R&D?
Immunization was practiced as early as the 17th century by Chinese Buddhist monks, but vaccinology in the Western hemisphere started in 1796 with Edward Jenner, who demonstrated immunity to smallpox, leading to the development of the first smallpox vaccine in 1798. Systematic implementation of mass smallpox immunization culminated in its global eradication in 1979 (1). More recent successes have included the rapid, 5-year development of a vaccine against Ebola (2), but the development of vaccines is generally a slow and painful process (3). Vaccines must be shown to be safe, pure, potent, and effective for regulatory approval, and this process can take 10–15 years. Added to that, vaccines have a high attrition rate compared to standard drugs, with fewer than 10% of vaccine candidates ever reaching the market (4).
Vaccine development has changed gear in a radical way with the COVID-19 pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (5). The SARS-CoV-2 genome was published on 11 January and this triggered intense activity around the world to develop a vaccine that includes the evaluation of next-generation vaccine technology. As a result, records were broken with the first vaccine candidate entering human clinical testing already on 16 March. By 8 April 2020, 115 vaccine candidates were being evaluated worldwide, and it is possible that vaccine could be available under emergency use or similar protocols by early 2021.
The intense speed of COVID-19 vaccine development, together with the threat of future pandemics, may well represent a fundamental change in the way vaccines are developed. This need for speed and efficiency can be expected to increase the demand for more effective bioanalytical tools, including platforms to run the immunoassays that play such a fundamental role in supplying reliable data for vaccine R&D and manufacturing.
The need for high-performance immunoassays in vaccine development
Vaccine development involves a large number of tests to support vaccine R&D, from early, pre-clinical studies to final production, testing, and release of batches. Bioanalysis during vaccine development presents many challenges in diversity of assay complexity, sample matrices, analyte types, and demands on workflow efficiency. Immunoassays are used to characterize vaccine titer, purity, affinity, and potency, as well as their immunogenic response in both animals and humans.
Samples for analysis vary greatly, with a wide range of analytes that include polysaccharides, proteins and peptides that must be measured in diverse matrices. Added to that, the new generation of vaccines involves increasing numbers of antigens.
Plate-based immunoassays have become the gold standard for many aspects of vaccine bioanalysis, including quantifying antigen epitopes, assessing impurity levels, and vaccine potency assays, including vaccine titer and immunogenicity. Increasingly tight project timelines, however, are driving the search for improvements in immunoassay performance, including:
- The use of smaller amounts of precious reagents, such as vaccine candidate molecules, and samples from small test animals
- Assays that can readily handle serum and plasma samples, formulations with aluminum particles, and emulsions
- Reduction of hands-on time
- Reduction of assay development time
Let’s look at a few examples of where effective immunoassays can contribute to speeding up vaccine R&D.
The rapid detection of antigen-specific antibodies in serum
Measuring quantity and quality of antibodies in plasma samples or produced by memory B cells in vaccinated subjects is key to understanding how protective lifelong antibody responses can be induced. Determining the relative frequencies of antigen specific memory B cells in human peripheral blood commonly involves a serial limiting dilution assay (sLDA) followed by analysis of cell culture supernatants by ELISA. The problem is that ELISA is laborious, consumes large amounts of reagents and sample, and slows productivity.
Gaining insights into antibody affinity
The precise and accurate determination of binding affinity between epitopes and elicited antibodies can be very valuable in vaccine R&D, and even in batch QC. Real-time, surface-based measurements such as surface plasmon resonance (SPR), biolayer interferometry (BLI), and quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) technology are commonly used to measure affinity but require that one of the interactants is attached to the surface, which may affect the determination of KD.
Immunoassays can be used to measure free unmodified interactants in equilibrated solutions and deliver more accurate affinity data providing the measurement method does not disturb the equilibrium. This is possible with a rapid flow-through immunoassay that enables the determination of free interactants in equilibrated solutions since interaction times of only a few seconds between sample and capture column avoid the equilibrium shifts that are inherent in assays requiring longer incubation times. Not only that, with the right immunoassay platform it is also possible to rapidly affinity-screen analytes and reagents.
Reagent screening and comparison of vaccine lots for release testing
The complexity of vaccines is increasing. For example, HPV (human papilloma virus) vaccine has increased from bivalent to quadrivalent, and the latest generation includes a nonvalent form. Bioanalysis of multivalent vaccines requires the development of large numbers of assays to measure polysaccharide and protein analytes in multivalent vaccines, and lot-to-lot variation in antisera.
Increasing efficiency under these conditions means minimizing the efforts needed to develop assays and the consumption of, for example, labeled detection antibodies. Added to that there is the need for rapid turnaround time and high throughput. An ability to visualize the binding event can also be a real plus to give more insight into the quality of binding reactions. Again, choosing the right immunoassay platform can make this possible.
A number of leading vaccine manufacturers have been faced with these challenges and have chosen Gyrolab® technology as a solution to help boost the efficiency of their vaccine R&D, bioprocess development and manufacturing. A new application note illustrates how Gyrolab systems have boosted the performance of vaccine R&D, from detecting plasma antibodies in vaccinees and determining the affinity of antigen-antibody interactions in early development, to the measurement of antigen titer and HCP impurities in bioprocess.
Download the Application Note
- WHO commemorates the 40th anniversary of smallpox eradication.
- WHO prequalifies Ebola vaccine, paving the way for its use in high-risk countries
- Vaccinations in the Pipeline. Nicholas Hamm. Drug Topics, July 11, 2019, 163(7)
- Risk in Vaccine Research and Development Quantified. Pronker ES et al (2013) PLoS ONE 8(3): e57755. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057755
- The COVID-19 vaccine development landscape. Thanh Le T et al, Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020 Apr 9. doi: 10.1038/d41573-020-00073-5.